Category Archives: Reptiles

Climber

Posted on by

A male western fence lizard hangs onto the edge of an old log at Smith Rock State Park

After featuring an eastern fence lizard, here’s a look at the western variety. The blue patch under the chin indicates that this is a male.

I’m not a rock climber but I enjoy watching both the two-legged and four-legged variety at Smith Rock State Park. I found this fence lizard on an old log in the higher elevations at the park.

You can find the little guys everywhere from the valley floor to the rocks along the cliff faces to the top of the rock formations. A telephoto lens was helpful, as they didn’t like a close approach and they scamper along the rocks a lot faster than I.

Confessions of a Pixel Peeper

Posted on by

American alligator eating a crab near sunrise at Huntington Beach State Park

The world of photography is full of long running and tiresome debates — I think some people get into photography strictly for the debates. The problem is, like most debates in life, people tend to gravitate towards the extremes and the valid points on both sides are lost in a sea of hyperbole.

One of the oldest is this old chestnut: “Which is more important, the photographer or the equipment?” The purists trot out the same tired cliche, “Give Ansel Adams a disposable camera and he’ll take better pictures than the average photographer with the best equipment available.” Which is both true and beside the point. Obviously the photographer is the most important element of the artistic side, but just because equipment isn’t the most important, doesn’t mean that it isn’t important.

An artist will understand the limitations of his tools and work within their limits to create the best result possible, so the purists are on the right track with their Ansel analogy. But a better question to ask is why didn’t Ansel shoot with a disposable camera? It’s the job of the artist to choose the appropriate tools, because your tools will define the limitations you have to work with.

The advent of digital photography has introduced new tiresome debates. One of which is: “Which is more important, the picture that you print or the quality of the picture viewed onscreen at 100%?”

The purists proudly stick out their chests and announce “The print!” They derisively label anyone who wants to view their pictures at 100% pixel detail on their monitors as pixel peepers or measurebators. People who can’t see the forest for the trees.

I have a confession to make: I’m a pixel peeper.

Continue reading →